MenuMenu Image


Impressions from CGI U 2016

April 13 Wednesday 02:02 PM

Three Martin School students had the honor of attending the Clinton Global Initiative University in California the first weekend of April. To be selected, students submitted proposals to address a need in education, public health, human rights, poverty, or climate change. Beta Ardiansyah, a second-year Martin School student, was selected to participate in the three-day conference with other students from all over the world. The goal of his proposal is "to end child labor in rubber-farmer households in the Rambang Lubay Indonesia," which he hopes to achieve through subsidizing family income to free up children to go to school.

He really enjoyed the speakers, especially Salman Khan, the CEO of Khan Academy. One of his big takeaways from that particular session was simple—"don’t waste inspiration"! Even if they come to you at 2 am, write them down.

While some of the sessions were more general, others were focused on the practical details of implementing the possible solutions to complex problems in the student project proposals. Beta attended sessions that concentrated on how to maintain your network, fundraising, and marketing your ideas. These sessions gave Beta tangible ideas to make his project better; he realized that for the sake of scalability, his methods would need to be adjusted so that he could get buy-in from all stakeholders.

What was the best feature of the conference? “Networking!” Beta shared, “developing countries in the world have a similar problem” in education, so being able to talk about how different groups have had success in the area was great.

Students who may be interested in participating next year, Beta says he would recommend it 125 percent!

Read CGI’s recap here.

Capstone Chronicles, Part 2

April 7 Thursday 10:29 AM

This is the second installment of an ongoing series following our MPA and MPP students in their final semester as they complete their Capstone Project, which is an intensive research project that addresses a self-selected policy question. The finished product includes a written paper and an oral presentation to a panel of experts.

We recently checked up on our Capstone Project cohort! We are more than halfway through the semester at this point, and our group of students has moved on from defining their research question and completing their literature review to finalizing their research design and doing analysis. Right before spring break, the group also had the opportunity to participate in an “elevator pitch” event.

The Art of Research
Methodologies for these projects can vary greatly, from qualitative program evaluations to econometric analyses (or some combination of the two). Selecting the best method can be complicated by the nature of the data available. Austin Coleman, a second-year MPP student, is addressing “the effect of income on broadband access. I chose this topic because of the persistence of the gap in access between individuals living in urban and rural areas,” he explains. How can you design your methodology to answer this question? Austin selected multivariate regression analysis; he’s using county-level data from the FCC and the Department of Agriculture.

However, he’s been presented with challenges in regards to his data. “The most interesting impact the data has had on my methodology is related to the amount of state-level variation present,” Austin notes. “State-level factors influence data aggregated at the county level, which I suspect is due to variation in state regulatory policy and the providers present in each state.”

Pitching your Ideas
The Thursday prior to spring break, students met with six volunteer professionals from a variety of backgrounds to present their research in sixty seconds– including a description of the topic, how it is being researched, and why it matters. No pressure, right? During the event, students met one-on-one with two of the experts; after giving their pitch, the practitioner and the student could chat for a few minutes about their research and presentation in greater depth. The feedback was positive– our experts were especially heartened to see students using primary data sources and thinking through implementation considerations.

Faculty Spotlight: Dr. David Agrawal

March 10 Thursday 03:59 PM

We caught up with Dr. David Agrawal, an Assistant Professor of Economics both at the Martin School and in the Department of Economics, to learn more about his interests. His website can be found here.
What is your favorite topic to teach? Why?
Taxes!  Taxes change the behavior of people.  Taxes can change how much someone will work or save.  They can influence charitable giving and decisions on where to live or work.  Taxes can influence the timing of births and even the timing of deaths.  Given that taxes can potentially influence so many aspects of behavior, I want my students to learn whether these responses are large or small and how the size of these responses influences optimal tax policy.
What research are you currently working on?
A recent paper, “The Internet as a Tax Haven? The Effect of the Internet on Tax Competition” studies how municipalities adjust their sale tax rate in response to e-commerce.  If online transactions are untaxed, the Internet may act as a tax haven and put downward pressure on local sales tax rates. On the other hand, if e-commerce is taxed, the Internet may act as an anti-haven, allowing cities and towns to collect taxes on remote transactions that previously went untaxed.  The results in this paper suggest that many towns perceive the Internet as a tax haven and lower their tax rate if they have a higher number of households with access to the Internet.  In addition, William Fox (University of Tennessee) and I are writing a policy research paper “Sales Taxes in an e-Commerce Generation” that discusses the economic argument for levying sales taxes on the basis of the destination of the sale.  We then discuss various policy options for how the United States can reform its sales and use tax system to better achieve destination taxation on online transactions.  In conducting this research, we highlight several economic lessons from recent European Union reforms designed to address taxing digital products.
What is the “hot topic” in your field right now?
One of the hottest topics in public finance is the study of notches and the bunching of individuals on the tax-favored side of the notch.  A notch is a discontinuous change in an individual’s budget set.  These notches in the tax code imply that a very small change in an individual’s behavior can cause very large changes in tax payments.  Our tax system features many notches, but they have only been studied recently.  One example is the Saver’s Credit.  A married couple with income of $30,000 that contributes more than $2000 of savings will receive a $1000 tax credit.  However, if this couple declares $30,001 of income and has the same saving, the credit will fall to only $400.  The incentives to work an hour less or hide some income from the tax authority are large.  My advisor’s article, “Buenas Notches: Lines and Notches in Tax System Design” was an important article that helped inspire research on notches.
What is your favorite thing about the Martin School?
I enjoy having many colleagues who are supportive of my research agenda and who provide great feedback on my research.  I also appreciate having several colleagues that conduct research on taxation.

Tis the Season for the Job Search

March 10 Thursday 10:30 AM

MPA/MPP students in their final semester are busy with more than just classes. Most of you are also tackling your Capstone Projects and applying for jobs. We have a new resource for you! While we e-mail out opportunities on our listservs, we know it can be tough to keep track. So, we are now going to post those opportunities here on our website so that you can access them at your leisure. Of course, if you stumble across fellowships or other positions you think your colleagues would find of interest, share those with Jackie ( or Sarah ( to get them posted.

Happy hunting!

MPA Student on Regional Winning Team at NASPAA Competition!

March 8 Tuesday 12:13 PM

This past weekend, Nathan and Sarah Smith represented the Martin School at NASPAA’s second annual student simulation competition, taking on international climate change policy. Students from all over the midwest region participated at IUPUI’s campus in Indianapolis.

Each was assigned a sector whose interests they were to represent as they negotiated with six other sectors to create a policy package reducing global temperature rise to two degrees Celsius. All the teams not only negotiated with each other, but also used a sophisticated climate change simulator to test their ideas and solidify their plans. At the end of the day, each of the three teams produced a policy package, presentation, memo, and staffing suggestion for their recommendations.

“I was assigned to the Climate Hawks sector, which represents environmental interest groups like Greenpeace, World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), The Nature Conservancy, for example,” Nathan shares. This sector was unique in that it didn’t have any decision-making power, unlike Sarah’s sector– global average carbon pricing. Both Sarah and Nathan enjoyed working directly with MPP and MPA students from all over the midwest on such a timely issue.

In the end, Nathan’s team was the regional winner! Nathan felt that his team’s presentation, focus on feasibility, and achievement of a very difficult objective set his team apart. Nathan describes some of the major features of their package below:

“There were a few key features of our plan that required some sacrifices from nearly everyone involved in order to effectively curb climate change.  Some of these features that we, after much debate, came to an agreement on were a $100/ton price on carbon, significant reductions in agriculture land use, an accelerated nationwide retirement of coal, new regulations on automobile and building efficiency standards, and significant long-term subsidies for renewable energy sources and new technology.”

While working on one of the toughest international policy questions of our time was taxing, both Nathan and Sarah walked away from the competition hopeful. To achieve success in climate change globally, everyone must come to the table ready to work together.